IMO, the person who wrote this is clueless, but what can you expect from a women sports writer.
I'll buy the 'Eers at #1 and Cuse at #8. But Cincy should be much higher (in my totally biased opinion ) even without Mauk. Loo-vul should be MUCH lower with their swiss cheese defense and Brohmless offense. I think Pitt has the potential to be top 3. USF is just overrated. I see them and Rutgers being middle of the road in the Big East. UCONN is about right. They lucked into their undeserving #2 finish in the conference this year.
Line Judge Administrator
Number of posts : 211 Registration date : 2008-02-04
Subject: Re: Big East spring rankings according to espn article Wed Feb 27, 2008 12:40 pm
Rutgers won't be nearly as good without Rice, they'll have to rely on Teel's arm. (uh oh for them) Louisville will be bad without Brohm and their defense has never been good. Pitt could be good, they did upset WVU last year, but still only won a few games. South Florida is good, but I don't know if they're better than Cincy, especially since Cincy beat them last year and Cincy isn't losing many starters.
AtzingerB Rookie
Number of posts : 247 Age : 36 Location : Fremont, Ohio Favorite Teams : Cleveland Browns, Boston Celtics, Ohio State Buckeyes Registration date : 2008-02-06
Subject: Re: Big East spring rankings according to espn article Wed Feb 27, 2008 8:05 pm
I agree line judge, and I think Cincy has a really good shot at winning the Big East next year
Sponsored content
Subject: Re: Big East spring rankings according to espn article
Big East spring rankings according to espn article
Subject: Big East spring rankings according to espn article 
Wed Feb 27, 2008 1:09 am
) even without Mauk. Loo-vul should be MUCH lower with their swiss cheese defense and Brohmless offense. I think Pitt has the potential to be top 3. USF is just overrated. I see them and Rutgers being middle of the road in the Big East. UCONN is about right. They lucked into their undeserving #2 finish in the conference this year.
